Taniguchi v. Schultz Taniguchi v. Schultz

Taniguchi v. Schultz

303 F.3D 950, 2002.C09.0000969 , 2 CAL. DAILY OP. SERV. 7739, 2002 DAILY JOURNAL D.A.R. 9695

    • 0,99 €
    • 0,99 €

Publisher Description

However, 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(5) provides that "[h]abeas corpus relief is not completely foreclosed, the district court retains jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 when the petitioner has no other remedy. " Magana-Pizano, 200 F.3d 603, 608 (9th Cir. 1999). Here, § 1252(b)(5) provides a specific remedy.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
2002
23 August
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
16
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SIZE
65.5
KB

More Books by Supreme Court of Alaska

Beers v. Jim Robison Beers v. Jim Robison
1985
Butler v. Dunlap Butler v. Dunlap
1997
State v. Arbuckle State v. Arbuckle
1997
Benedict v. Key Bank of Alaska Benedict v. Key Bank of Alaska
1996
Voigt v. Snowden Voigt v. Snowden
1996
Ahwinona v. State Ahwinona v. State
1996