Tanner v. Karnavas

Richard B. Tanner, Jr. appeals a take-nothing judgment rendered on the jurys verdict that Benjamin Karnavas was not negligent in connection with an automobile collision between Tanner and Karnavas. In six points of error, Tanner contends there was no evidence to support the instruction on unavoidable accident, the jurys finding was against the great weight and "sufficiency" of the evidence, the trial court committed several evidentiary errors, and the grant of partial summary judgment in favor of Gary and Pam Karnavas was error. For reasons that follow, we dismiss appellants fifth point of error for lack of jurisdiction and otherwise affirm the trial courts judgment.