Valuing Properties with Wetland Potential (Author Abstract) (Report) Valuing Properties with Wetland Potential (Author Abstract) (Report)

Valuing Properties with Wetland Potential (Author Abstract) (Report‪)‬

Appraisal Journal 2011, Spring, 79, 2

    • 2,99 €
    • 2,99 €

Publisher Description

ABSTRACT The Clean Water Act and federal policy of "no net loss of wetlands" prohibit the destruction of wetland acreage in the United States. However, these policies allow for wetland destruction to be offset by developing and converting suitable land into qualifying wetlands, which can then be sold as credits to developers. Land with a highest and best use for wetland mitigation credits typically requires environmental analysis, engineering expertise, landscape design, and approval by authorities before it can be resold for that purpose. This article offers information, examples, and suggestions for the valuation of property readily converted to qualifying wetlands.

GENRE
Business & Personal Finance
RELEASED
2011
22 March
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
46
Pages
PUBLISHER
The Appraisal Institute
SIZE
491.4
KB

More Books by Appraisal Journal

Statistical Reasoning in Family Limited Partnership Appraisals: New Tax Court Scrutiny (1) (Notes and Issues) Statistical Reasoning in Family Limited Partnership Appraisals: New Tax Court Scrutiny (1) (Notes and Issues)
2004
Residential Appraising: Changes and Challenges Ahead. Residential Appraising: Changes and Challenges Ahead.
2006
Ground Leases: Rent Reset Valuation Issues. Ground Leases: Rent Reset Valuation Issues.
2011
Where the Overall Cap Rate Meets the Discount Rate (Property Valuation) Where the Overall Cap Rate Meets the Discount Rate (Property Valuation)
2004
Market Segmentation: An Important Facet of Market Analysis for Mineral Appraisals. Market Segmentation: An Important Facet of Market Analysis for Mineral Appraisals.
2004
Comments on "A Higher and Better Definition" (Letters to the Editor) (Letter to the Editor) Comments on "A Higher and Better Definition" (Letters to the Editor) (Letter to the Editor)
2004