![Obigbo V. State](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![Obigbo V. State](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
Obigbo V. State
-
- 0,99 €
-
- 0,99 €
Publisher Description
Obiozor Louis Obigbo appeals his conviction for insurance fraud. Following a jury trial, appellant was found guilty and sentenced to confinement for two years in a state jail facility, probated for five years. In three points of error, appellant contends the evidence is legally insufficient to support the verdict, the evidence is factually insufficient to show appellant knowingly and intentionally committed an offense, and the trial court committed charge error by failing to define the word "material". Because we conclude the evidence is legally and factually sufficient to support appellant's conviction and the trial court did not err in omitting a definition of "material" in the charge, we affirm.