Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Golden Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Golden

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Golden

97 OHIO ST.3D 230, 778 N.E.2D 564, 2002.OH.0006250

    • 0,99 €
    • 0,99 €

Publisher Description

1. We must decide in this case how to appropriately sanction respondent, Shelby Diane Golden of Lima, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0039787, who violated a series of Disciplinary Rules while representing clients in eight different cases, failed to cooperate with relator, Disciplinary Counsel, in the investigation of her misconduct, and did not update her business address with the Office of Attorney Registration as required. The Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline, after finding that respondents debilitating clinical depression contributed significantly to her misconduct, recommended a sanction less severe than an indefinite suspension from the practice of law in Ohio. We agree that respondents depression is a mitigating influence sufficient to warrant rejection of the disbarrment recommended by relator. However, misconduct of this magnitude must be met with an indefinite suspension for the publics protection, and therefore we find this sanction appropriate.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
2002
13 November
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
10
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SIZE
65.5
KB

More Books by Ohio Supreme Court

In re Estate of Roberts In re Estate of Roberts
2002
Cave v. Conrad Cave v. Conrad
2002
Coulumbus Bar Association v. Halliburton-Cohen Coulumbus Bar Association v. Halliburton-Cohen
2002
State Ex Rel Kim v. Wachenschwanz State Ex Rel Kim v. Wachenschwanz
2001
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Carson Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Carson
2001
State Ex Rel Bragg v. Seidner State Ex Rel Bragg v. Seidner
2001