Prosecutor V. Boskoski. (Terrorist Activities) Prosecutor V. Boskoski. (Terrorist Activities)

Prosecutor V. Boskoski. (Terrorist Activities‪)‬

Australian International Law Journal 2009, Annual, 16

    • 2,99 €
    • 2,99 €

Publisher Description

Introduction On 10 July 2008, Trial Chamber II (1) of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia ('ICTY') delivered the judgment in the case of Prosecutor v Ljube Boskoski and Johan Tarculovski. (2) The case concerned an alleged attack on the unarmed ethnic Albanian village of Ljuboten, the subsequent murder and cruel treatment of its residents, and the wanton destruction of property by the army and police ('Security Forces') of the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia ('FYROM'). The Indictment alleged that these crimes occurred during an armed conflict between the FYROM Security Forces and the ethnic Albanian National Liberation Army ('NLA'). (3) This is a significant case because it provides a detailed application of the Tadic (4) threshold test to ascertain whether a state of 'internal armed conflict' exists. Also, the Trial Chamber's findings on the principle of superior responsibility demonstrates the difficulties associated with holding a civilian and, more specifically, a politician, criminally responsible for the acts of their subordinates. The decision sends a strong message that the principle of superior responsibility imposes different obligations on military commanders and civilian superiors. In the case of civilian superiors, the Trial Chamber held that it would suffice for them to report crimes to competent authorities to escape international criminal responsibility.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
2009
1 January
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
21
Pages
PUBLISHER
University of Western Sydney, School of Law
SIZE
264.5
KB

More Books by Australian International Law Journal

The Genocide Convention Case: Confusion Or Clarity? Case Concerning the Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Bosnia and Herzegovina V. Serbia and Montenegro), Judgment of 26 February 2007, General List No. 91. The Genocide Convention Case: Confusion Or Clarity? Case Concerning the Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Bosnia and Herzegovina V. Serbia and Montenegro), Judgment of 26 February 2007, General List No. 91.
2007
Secondary Forms of Genocide and Command Responsibility Under the Statutes of the ICTY, ICTR and ICC. (International Criminal Tribunals for the Former Yugoslavia and Rwanda, International Criminal Court) Secondary Forms of Genocide and Command Responsibility Under the Statutes of the ICTY, ICTR and ICC. (International Criminal Tribunals for the Former Yugoslavia and Rwanda, International Criminal Court)
2010
Case Concerning the Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Bosnia and Herzegovina V. Serbia and Montenegro), Judgment of 26 February 2007, General List No. 91. Case Concerning the Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Bosnia and Herzegovina V. Serbia and Montenegro), Judgment of 26 February 2007, General List No. 91.
2007
Financing Adaptation in Pacific Island Countries: Prospects for the Post-2012 Climate Change Regime. Financing Adaptation in Pacific Island Countries: Prospects for the Post-2012 Climate Change Regime.
2007
The Australian Trials of Class B and C Japanese War Crime Suspects, 1945-51. The Australian Trials of Class B and C Japanese War Crime Suspects, 1945-51.
2009
Hate Speech and Freedom of Speech in Australia (Book Review) Hate Speech and Freedom of Speech in Australia (Book Review)
2007