![Randall Scott Blackshear v. State Florida](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![Randall Scott Blackshear v. State Florida](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
Randall Scott Blackshear v. State Florida
FL.45074; 531 So. 2d 956; 13 Fla. Law W. 586 (1988)
-
- 0,99 €
-
- 0,99 €
Publisher Description
We agreed to review Blackshear v State, 513 So.2d 174 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987), because of apparent conflict with Herring v. State,
411 So.2d 966 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982). Our jurisdiction is predicated on article V, section 3(b)(3), Florida Constitution. This case involves an application of the principle of North Carolina v Pearce, 395 U.S. 711, 725-26, 89 S. Ct. 2072, 23 L.
Ed. 2d 656 (1969), in which the United States Supreme Court said: