![Raybelle Vann v. Commonwealth Pennsylvania](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![Raybelle Vann v. Commonwealth Pennsylvania](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
Raybelle Vann v. Commonwealth Pennsylvania
1985.PA.43598; 494 A.2D 1081, 508 PA. 139
-
- 0,99 €
-
- 0,99 €
Publisher Description
We review an Opinion and Order of the Commonwealth Court, 81 Pa. Commw. 189, 473 A.2d 237, holding that in an unemployment compensation benefit case where the employer has the burden of proof, the referee must explain to an uncounseled claimant that he is not required to testify and that if he does testify his testimony may be used to establish ineligibility for benefits.