Sidney v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County
CA.41074; 244 Cal. Rptr. 31; 198 Cal. App. 3d 710 (1988)
-
- 0,99 €
-
- 0,99 €
Publisher Description
[198 CalApp3d Page 713] In this case we hold that the statute of limitations does not bar amending a compulsory cross-complaint to state a cause of action against the plaintiff for a different injury arising from the same accident where the cause of action was not barred when the original complaint was filed. Petitioner Erik Sidney seeks a writ of mandate commanding respondent superior court to grant him leave to amend his cross-complaint to seek damages for personal injury as well as property loss. Petitioner is the defendant in a negligence action (Kinoshita v. Sidney, Super. Ct. L.A. County, No. C 588711) filed by plaintiff Pauline Kinoshita.