![04/10/97 State Minnesota V. Jerome Deon Nunn](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![04/10/97 State Minnesota V. Jerome Deon Nunn](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
04/10/97 State Minnesota V. Jerome Deon Nunn
-
- USD 0.99
-
- USD 0.99
Descripción editorial
1. The trial court did not abuse its discretion when it admitted "other crime" evidence under State v. Wofford, 262 Minn. 112, 114 N.W.2d 267 (1962). The evidence related to a "ride in the park" that appellant and three of his friends took with appellant's cousin and to threats made to his cousin during the ride. The evidence was relevant because it supported the prosecution's case on motive and its probative value was not outweighed by its potential for prejudice.