![10/25/94 Alexander Terletsky V. Prudential Property](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![10/25/94 Alexander Terletsky V. Prudential Property](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
10/25/94 Alexander Terletsky V. Prudential Property
-
- USD 0.99
-
- USD 0.99
Descripción editorial
In this appeal and cross-appeal, we must determine whether the trial court's findings of fact are adequately supported by evidence. In addition, we are asked to determine whether the trial court properly concluded that appellee, Prudential Property and Casualty Insurance Company, acted in bad faith in partially disputing payment of appellant's, Alexander Terletsky's, uninsured motorist claim. We hold that the trial court's factual findings have adequate support in the evidence. We further hold that appellee had a rational basis for disputing appellant's claim; thus, the trial court's determination of bad faith was improper. Accordingly, we reverse.
Más libros de Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Commonwealth Ex Rel. Robinson v. Baldi
1954
Higgs Et Al. v. New York Fire Ins. Co.
1954
Novel v. Unemployment Compensation Board Review
1953
Stachowski v. Incorporated Real Estate Investors Et Al.
1953
Lang Et Ux. v. Recht Et Al.
1952
Glen Alden Coal Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board Review
1952