![Aesthetic Property Maintenance Inc. v. Capital Indemnity Corp.](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![Aesthetic Property Maintenance Inc. v. Capital Indemnity Corp.](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
Aesthetic Property Maintenance Inc. v. Capital Indemnity Corp.
900 P.2d 1210, 183 Ariz. 74, AZ.40139(1995)
-
- USD 0.99
-
- USD 0.99
Descripción editorial
En Banc MARTONE, Justice. We are asked to decide whether substantial compliance with our contractor licensing statute can satisfy the licensing prerequisite to a civil action under A.R.S. § 32-1153. We hold that it can.