![Tulsa Municipal Airport Trust v. Nat. Gypsum](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![Tulsa Municipal Airport Trust v. Nat. Gypsum](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
Tulsa Municipal Airport Trust v. Nat. Gypsum
551 P.2D 304, 1976 OK CIV APP 6, 1976.OK.0040040
-
- USD 0.99
-
- USD 0.99
Descripción editorial
1 Within 17 months after its completion the huge four-acre roof of plaintiffs new aircraft hangar - a structure nearly half as big as Houstons famed Astrodome - began to leak. Later, while this million-dollar lawsuit pended against various companies and individuals who had played some part in constructing the facilitys faulty overhead, plaintiffs say they successfully undertook to minimize their continuing losses through engaging the professional services of an attorney and a renowned roof expert. Their effort to recover fees charged by these two professionals as mitigation expenses was thwarted when demurrers to plaintiffs amended and supplemental petition were sustained and their action dismissed. It is of this ruling reversal is sought.