Vaccone v. Syken Vaccone v. Syken

Vaccone v. Syken

899 A.2D 1103, 2006.PA.0001018

    • USD 0.99
    • USD 0.99

Descripción editorial

This Appeal presents the question of whether an order disqualifying trial counsel in a civil case is an interlocutory order, which is not immediately appealable. Appellants Joseph and Rose Vaccone contend that the trial court erred in disqualifying their counsel, Frank D. Branella, from representing them in their action against Appellee Marc J. Syken. The Superior Court quashed their appeal of this order, ruling that the order disqualifying counsel is interlocutory, and is not an appealable collateral order under Pennsylvania Rule of Appellate Procedure ("Pa.R.A.P.") 313. We agree, and, as discussed below, we hold that a trial court order disqualifying counsel in a civil case is interlocutory and is not immediately appealable.

GÉNERO
Técnicos y profesionales
PUBLICADO
2006
19 de junio
IDIOMA
EN
Inglés
EXTENSIÓN
9
Páginas
EDITORIAL
LawApp Publishers
VENDEDOR
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
TAMAÑO
56.5
KB

Más libros de In the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Eastern District

Commonwealth v. Hanible Commonwealth v. Hanible
2003
Commonwealth v. Dennis Commonwealth v. Dennis
2004
Commonwealth v. Butler Commonwealth v. Butler
2000
Rossa v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board Rossa v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board
2003
In re Petition to Set Aside Nomination of Fitzpatrick In re Petition to Set Aside Nomination of Fitzpatrick
2003
Harahan v. Ac&S Harahan v. Ac&S
2003