![Vale Chemical Company v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![Vale Chemical Company v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
Vale Chemical Company v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company
1985.PA.41754 490 A.2D 896, 340 PA. SUPER. 510
-
- USD 0.99
-
- USD 0.99
Descripción editorial
The plaintiff, Vale Chemical Company, Inc. (Vale), brought a declaratory judgment action against two of its former insurers, Manufacturers Casualty Insurance Company (Manufacturers) and Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company (Hartford), as well as Transamerica Insurance Company as successor in interest to Manufacturers. The action was brought to determine which, if any, of these insurers has a duty to defend and, if necessary, to indemnify Vale in an action brought against Vale by a Sandra Smith in 1980 in the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois.
Más libros de Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Commonwealth Ex Rel. Robinson v. Baldi
1954
Higgs Et Al. v. New York Fire Ins. Co.
1954
Novel v. Unemployment Compensation Board Review
1953
Stachowski v. Incorporated Real Estate Investors Et Al.
1953
Lang Et Ux. v. Recht Et Al.
1952
Glen Alden Coal Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board Review
1952