Verne L. Abel v. Mike Russells Standard Verne L. Abel v. Mike Russells Standard

Verne L. Abel v. Mike Russells Standard

1996.MO.22371 , 924 S.W.2D 502

    • USD 0.99
    • USD 0.99

Descripción editorial

The issue in this case is whether an employee who suffers an idiopathic fall is entitled to compensation under section 287.120.1, RSMo 1994, when the conditions of the work place bear no causal relationship to the employees injury. The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission denied workers compensation. The Court of Appeals, Southern District, reversed, relying on this Courts decision in Alexander v. D. L. Sitton Motor Lines, 851 S.W.2d 525 (Mo. banc 1993). One member of the court of appeals panel Dissented and certified the case to this Court because he believed the majority opinion was contrary to Alexander . We have jurisdiction, Mo. Const. art. V, § 10, and hold that section 287.120.1, RSMo 1994, requires the employee to establish a causal relationship between the conditions of the work place and his or her injuries before workers compensation is available. The decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission is affirmed.

GÉNERO
Técnicos y profesionales
PUBLICADO
1996
25 de junio
IDIOMA
EN
Inglés
EXTENSIÓN
11
Páginas
EDITORIAL
LawApp Publishers
VENDEDOR
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
TAMAÑO
64.4
KB

Más libros de Supreme Court of New Mexico

Merrifield v. Buckner Et Al. Merrifield v. Buckner Et Al.
1937
Tharp v. Massengill Tharp v. Massengill
1933
Pugh Et Al. v. Phelps Et Al. Pugh Et Al. v. Phelps Et Al.
1932
Thomas Et Al. v. Johns Thomas Et Al. v. Johns
1930
Casna v. White Et Al. Casna v. White Et Al.
1934
State Ex Rel. Walker v. Hinkle State Ex Rel. Walker v. Hinkle
1933