Vernon v. United States Vernon v. United States

Vernon v. United States

107 F.3D 869, 1997.C04.40695

    • USD 0.99
    • USD 0.99

Descripción editorial

Stanley Vernon ("Vernon") appeals a grant of summary judgment in favor of the United States in his negligence suit against the United States under the Federal Tort Claims Act ("FTCA"). Vernon argues the court erred because the United States does not qualify as a "statutory employer" under the South Carolina Workers Compensation Law, and is not entitled to the "exclusive remedy" defense found in that law. He further contends that because the South Carolina law is purely jurisdictional, it cannot serve as the underlying basis of a federal courts decision. The district court found that the United States is subject to South Carolina law, was Vernons statutory employer, and was entitled to assert the exclusive remedy defense. We agree, and for the reasons that follow, we affirm the district courts grant of summary judgment.

GÉNERO
Técnicos y profesionales
PUBLICADO
1997
5 de marzo
IDIOMA
EN
Inglés
EXTENSIÓN
7
Páginas
EDITORIAL
LawApp Publishers
VENDEDOR
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
TAMAÑO
53.2
KB

Más libros de Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals

United States v. Boone United States v. Boone
2000
[T][U] Hartman v. Mccarthy [T][U] Hartman v. Mccarthy
1996
[T][U] Butcher v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Co. [T][U] Butcher v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Co.
1996
[T][U] Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. Castetter [T][U] Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. Castetter
1996
[U] Haskins v. Farmers Home Administration [U] Haskins v. Farmers Home Administration
1996
[T][U] Likes v. Babbitt [T][U] Likes v. Babbitt
1996