Walking Among Us: The Alien Plan to Control Humanity (Unabridged‪)‬

Easily Discredits Itself.

Bear with me while I set the premise of my review...

I once listened to Art Bell interview Bob Lazar and noticed something peculiar. A caller asked Bob about his alleged list containing the names of people he supposedly worked with at Area 51. The caller claimed to know someone Bob worked with there and said the person’s name. Bob, somewhat surprised confirmed that the name was on the list. But then quickly revised his statement to suggest there was also a “Smith” on the list, implying that the situation was unremarkable. Art quickly dismissed it and moved on to the next caller. Neither Bob nor Art even considered pressing the caller further. If Bob was telling the truth, he would have wanted corroboration and Art should have jumped all over it. It would have revolutionized the whole UFO community. That was Bob’s big chance for vindication! Since Art didn’t even respond the the anomaly, this tells me he was in on it with Bob.

Travis Walton, the crackpot who the film Fire In The Sky was based on wrote details in his book about events he was never present for, such as the dialog between his fellow loggers in the moments after he was allegedly abducted. When asked about during an interview he had no answer for the discrepancy. In later interviews he began saying he was told later. But in that early interview he hadn’t thought of that excuse yet.

Over and over again these people weave elaborate stories, too grandiose to evaluate the little details that debunk much of their stories. Dr. Jacobs did this many times in this book.

The first red flag is that every single person who was abducted he gave aliases. Not a single one of them was identified, making it impossible to prove they even existed.

He tells an awkward story of an alien hybrid visiting a woman then using the bathroom. Then oopsie, got a little piss on the seat. The woman wiped it up with a tissue, gave it to Jacobs, who sent it to a lab to by analyzed. First, a researcher would understand that such evidence could be the single most important evidence in the history of mankind. Rather than publicly turning it over to the scientific community - it was just sent to the lab where it was accidentally thrown away. So absolutely ZERO emphasis was put on how previously the laboratory should treat the evidence. Huge plot hole bro!

Further, the woman also claimed that a hybrid entered her home in order to taste food as part of a learning experience for them. By tasting all these things and drinking from a soda can as she put it, the hybrid alien would have left his alien DNA all over the place. But somehow, the woman was not interested in collecting that.

Same woman again was supposedly on a webcam chat with Jacobs when she heard a noise from upstairs. She suspected it was another abduction event that was about to happen to her. Absurdly, both she and Jacobs thought it was best that they terminate the chat. WHAT!?!?! She is about to get abducted and your first reflex is to TURN OFF the camera!?!?

The book is filled with these types of absurdities which really brings into question whether or not Jacobs is simply inventing these abductees. I suspect so since they all seem to suffer from the same daft oversights.

Russia built an entire replicated American town and raised Russians from birth to behave as Americans in order to turn them into spies. The 80s comedy “The Experts” starring John Travolta was loosely based on it. In this respect, the Russians are apparently smarter than the aliens because the aliens have to rely on abductees to train their hybrids to behave like humans. Why not simply construct their own mock environment to raise the hybrids as humans? Major major plot holes throughout.

I suspect that Jacobs’s “abductees” do not exist. It would be interesting to steal his story idea though and write a Hollywood version of it. Since he suggests the events are true someone could do it without having to compensate him. That would show these charlatans!