A Bone Of Contention
The third Matthew Bartholomew Chronicle
-
- $5.99
-
- $5.99
Publisher Description
For the twentieth anniversary of the Matthew Bartholomew series, Sphere reissued the books with beautiful new illustrated covers.
-----------------------------
Cambridge in 1352 is rife with terrible clashes between the fledgling University and the townspeople. Matthew Bartholomew, physician and teacher at Michaelhouse college, is trying to keep the peace when a student is murdered and the town plunges into chaos.
At the same time a skeleton is discovered that is rumoured to belong to a local martyr, and Bartholomew has his hands full investigating both deaths while the rioting intensifies...
PUBLISHERS WEEKLY
Prostitutes, violent friars and thieving scholars slog through the stinking streets of medieval Cambridge in Gregory's rather convoluted follow-up to An Unholy Alliance. In 1352, hostility is running high between town and gown as well as between rival colleges at the university when the body of a young scholar, James Kenzie, is found in a sewage-filled channel called the King's Ditch. Riots break out in the town as physician Matthew Bartholomew and University Provost Brother Michael, a Benedictine monk, begin to investigate Kenzie's murder. With bodies piling up as more people are murdered and others die in the continuing riots, a bewildering number of characters, motives and opportunities center on a distinctive ring with a blue-green stone. It was given to Kenzie by his girlfriend, Dominica, but was missing from his finger when his body was found; later, it turned up on a skeleton hand reputed to be the remains of a local martyr killed 25 years earlier. The investigation extends back 25 years to when the ring was originally given to Dominica's mother. Bartholomew and Michael are good company, both enlightened thinkers who don't believe in astrology or superstition. Their environment is vividly brought to life in all its misery: bad food, airless rooms and the ever-present threat of plague. But Gregory touches too many bases too casually as she tries to dramatize the intersection of religious, political and plain personal conflicts.