A Call for Precedential Heads: Why the Supreme Court's Eyewitness Identification Jurisprudence is Anachronistic and Out-Of-Step with the Empirical Reality.
Law and Psychology Review 2007, Annual, 31
-
- $5.99
-
- $5.99
Publisher Description
All the evidence points rather strikingly to the conclusion that there is almost nothing more convincing than a live human being who takes the stand, points a finger at the defendant, and says, "That's the one!" (1) Do you solemnly swear before the everliving God that the testimony you are about to give in this cause shall be the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth?
GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
2007
January 1
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
59
Pages
PUBLISHER
The Law & Psychology Review
SELLER
The Gale Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation and an affiliate of Cengage Learning, Inc.
SIZE
356.4
KB
The Geriatric Sex Offender: Senile Or Pedophile?
2008
Criminal Insanity and Mens Rea: A Discussion of Alabama Insanity Law and the Role of Psychiatrists in Determining Criminal Insanity.
2007
Enhancing Law School Success: A Study of Goal Orientations, Academic Achievement and the Declining Self-Efficacy of Our Law Students.
2009
Mental Health Courts: An Overview and Redefinition of Tasks and Goals.
2009
Personality in Juror Decision-Making: Toward an Idiographic Approach in Research.
2009
Explaining Juvenile False Confessions: Adolescent Development and Police Interrogation.
2007