A Reply to the Current Critiques Formulated Against Hoppe's Argumentation Ethics (Hans-Hermann Hoppe) (Critical Essay)
Libertarian Papers 2009, Jan, 1
-
- $5.99
-
- $5.99
Publisher Description
Introduction This aim of this article is to defend the usage that Hans-Hermann Hoppe (1989; 2006) makes of performative contradiction for justifying the self-ownership axiom. "Any person who would try to dispute the property right in his own body would become caught up in a contradiction, as arguing in this way and claiming his argument to be true, would already implicitly accept precisely this norm as being valid" (Hoppe 2006, 133). The stake of this argument is to show with the help of performative contradiction that only the libertarian ethics based on self-ownership axiom can be justified. Better explanations of this idea will be provided in the next section.
Present Payments, Past Wrongs: Correcting Loose Talk About Nozick and Rectification (Critical Essay)
2009
Argumentation Ethics and the Philosophy of Freedom (Critical Essay)
2009
Two Constructions of Libertarianism (Critical Essay)
2009
The Importance of Christian Thought for the American Libertarian Movement: Christian Libertarianism, 1950-71 (Essay)
2010
Globalization and Peace: A Hayekian Perspective (Friedrich A. von Hayek) (Critical Essay)
2009
Austrian Economics--the Ultimate Achievement of an Intellectual Journey
2009