A Tale of Two Studies: Ethics, Bioterrorism, And the Censorship of Science.
The Hastings Center Report 2007, May-June, 37, 3
-
- $5.99
-
- $5.99
Publisher Description
Some scientific research should not be published. The risks to national security and public health override the social benefits of disseminating scientific results openly. Unfortunately, scientists themselves are not in a position to know which studies to withhold from public view, as the National Research Council has proposed. Yet neither can government alone be trusted to balance the competing interests at stake. "How and why is it that I do not describe my method for remaining underwater and how long I can remain there without coming up for air? I do not wish to divulge or publish this because of the evil nature of men, who might use it for murder on the sea-bed." (1)
Confronting Physician-Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia: My Father's Death (Essays)
2008
Access to Health-Related Goods (Bioethics & Human Rights)
2009
"Are Their Babies Different from Ours?" Dutch Culture and the Groningen Protocol (Letters)
2008
Rethinking the Ethics of Vital Organ Donations: Accepted Medical Practice Already Violates the Dead Donor Rule. Explicitly Jettisoning the Rule--Allowing Vital Organs to Be Extracted, Under Certain Conditions, From Living Patients--Is a Radical Change Only at the Conceptual Level. But It Would Expand the Pools of Eligible Organ Donors.
2008
Gender Identity Disorder in Childhood: Inconclusive Advice to Parents (Essay)
2009
A Not-So-New Eugenics: Harris and Savulescu on Human Enhancement.
2011