Abe Morris v. Jim Holt

This is a suit to recover an equity interest in two restaurants. We are asked whether Defendants issue tendered in substantially correct form, but refused, is sufficient under Tex. R. Civ. P. 279 to preserve error concerning an omitted issue relied upon by the opponent. We are additionally faced with the situation that the jury answers do not support a judgment for the Plaintiff, Jim Holt. After a jury trial, the trial .court rendered judgment favorable to Holt. The court of appeals affirmed in an unpublished opinion. We reverse the judgments of the trial court and the court of appeals and render a judgment that Holt take nothing.