Baney v. Eoute Baney v. Eoute

Baney v. Eoute

2001 Pa.Super. 260, 784 A.2d 132, 2001.PA.0001730

    • $0.99
    • $0.99

Publisher Description

1 William and Joy Baney (the Baneys) appeal from the trial courts order dismissing their complaint and entering a declaratory judgment in favor of Emily Eoute. The Baneys contend that the trial court erred in finding ambiguity in the language of a document that conveyed an easement from Eoute to the Baneys. The Baneys further contend that the trial court erred in concluding that the use of the easement was limited to the existing roadway rather than the fifty-foot width indicated in the metes and bounds description. After study, we affirm.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
2001
September 4
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
7
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SELLER
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
SIZE
51.8
KB

More Books by Pennsylvania Superior Court

Margaret v. Comcast-Spectacor Margaret v. Comcast-Spectacor
2001
Brinich V. Jencka Brinich V. Jencka
2000
Lewis V. Erie Insurance Co. Lewis V. Erie Insurance Co.
2000
Wiernik V. Phh Us Mortgage Corp. Wiernik V. Phh Us Mortgage Corp.
1999
C.W. v. K.A.W C.W. v. K.A.W
2001
Commonwealth v. Key Commonwealth v. Key
2001