Bay Area Addiction Research and Treatment Inc. v. City of Antioch Bay Area Addiction Research and Treatment Inc. v. City of Antioch

Bay Area Addiction Research and Treatment Inc. v. City of Antioch

179 F.3D 725, 9 A.D. CASES 722, 1999.C09.42333 , 99 CAL. DAILY OP. SERV. 4223

    • $0.99
    • $0.99

Publisher Description

Defendant Floyd Lentellis Garrett appeals his convictions on two counts related to an armed bank robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. S 2113 (a), (d), and (2); and 18 U.S.C. S 924(c)(1) and (2). The district court denied Garretts motion for continuance on the eve of trial. Garrett contends that, in denying this continuance, the district court committed reversible error. A divided panel of this court reversed Garretts convictions. See United States v. Garrett, 149 F.3d 1018 (9th Cir. 1998). We granted rehearing en banc and withdrew the panel opinion. See United States v. Garrett, 161 F.3d 583 (9th Cir. 1998).

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
1999
June 3
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
26
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SELLER
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
SIZE
85.2
KB
Cooper v. Calderon Cooper v. Calderon
2002
Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc.
1995
Crawford V. Honig Crawford V. Honig
1994
Porsche Cars North America, Inc. v. Allporshe.Com Porsche Cars North America, Inc. v. Allporshe.Com
2000
United States V. Zuno-Arce United States V. Zuno-Arce
1995
[T][U] Hartman v. Mccarthy [T][U] Hartman v. Mccarthy
1996