Bayer Ag v. Elan Pharmaceutical Research Corp. Bayer Ag v. Elan Pharmaceutical Research Corp.

Bayer Ag v. Elan Pharmaceutical Research Corp‪.‬

212 F.3D 1241, 2000.CFC.0042271 , 54 U.S.P.Q.2D 1711, 54 U.S.P.Q.2D 1711

    • $0.99
    • $0.99

Publisher Description

The Mead Corporation ("Mead") appeals from the judgment of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, holding that Mead infringed claims 1 and 13 of U.S. Patent No. 5,241,806 ("the 806 patent") owned by Riverwood International Corporation ("Riverwood") and that these claims were not invalid for obviousness. See Riverwood Intl Corp. v. Mead Corp., No. 1:94-CV-0090-CAM (N.D. Ga. Jan. 13, 1999) ("Order"). Because the district court erroneously concluded as a matter of law that the claims were not invalid for obviousness, we reverse.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
2000
May 12
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
30
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SELLER
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
SIZE
80.4
KB

More Books by Federal Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals

Bose Corporation V. Qsc Audio Products Bose Corporation V. Qsc Audio Products
2002
Semiconductor Energy Laboratory Co. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Semiconductor Energy Laboratory Co. v. Samsung Electronics Co.
2000
Northern Telecom Ltd. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Northern Telecom Ltd. v. Samsung Electronics Co.
2000
Karlin Technology v. Surgical Dynamics Inc. Karlin Technology v. Surgical Dynamics Inc.
1999
Dow Chemical Co. V. Sumitomo Chemical Company Dow Chemical Co. V. Sumitomo Chemical Company
2001
Monsanto Co. v. Mcfarling Monsanto Co. v. Mcfarling
2002