Belinda Moore Rogers v. Robert Stell and Mary Stell
TX.41221; 835 S.W.2d 100, 35 Tex. Sup. J. 1094 (1992)
-
- $0.99
-
- $0.99
Publisher Description
Per Curiam We hold that an undisclosed individual party witness may testify at trial where the party did not respond to or
supplement her response to an interrogatory seeking persons expected to be called at trial, but properly identified herself
as a person with knowledge of relevant facts. After a traffic accident, Robert and Mary Stell sued Belinda Rogers for property damage to their car. Among the twenty-three
interrogatories Rogers answered were the following: