Borsellino v. Goldman Sachs Group Borsellino v. Goldman Sachs Group

Borsellino v. Goldman Sachs Group

477 F.3D 502, 2007.C07.0000126

    • $0.99
    • $0.99

Publisher Description

Lewis Borsellino was a one-third partner in Chicago Trading and Arbitrage ("CTA"), a company that facilitated stock trading through remote access to the electronic stock exchange NASDAQ. His partners, whom he accused of acting behind his back and improperly using CTA resources, developed a technology to allow remote trading to occur without having to visit CTAs offsite trading location. They started a new business called Archipelago using this technology, and Goldman Sachs became a 25% owner. Archipelago was enormously successful. Borsellino sued Goldman Sachs, contending that it colluded with his former partners in CTA to defraud him of his rightful interest in the new venture. The district court dismissed the complaint under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 9(b), which contains heightened pleading requirements for fraud, and the plaintiffs now challenge that decision. Because the complaint does not adequately allege with any specificity a fraud or other misbehavior on the part of Goldman Sachs, we affirm the judgment of the district court.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
2007
February 20
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
14
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SELLER
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
SIZE
66.7
KB
Bott v. Four Star Corp. Bott v. Four Star Corp.
1984
Bott v. Four Star Corp. Bott v. Four Star Corp.
1984
Hart v. Fedex Ground Package System Inc. Hart v. Fedex Ground Package System Inc.
2006
Hopland Band of Pomo Indians v. United States Hopland Band of Pomo Indians v. United States
1988
High Tech Medical Instrumentation, Inc. v. New Image Industries, Inc. High Tech Medical Instrumentation, Inc. v. New Image Industries, Inc.
1995
Faas v. Sears Faas v. Sears
2008