Chase v. Brooks Chase v. Brooks

Chase v. Brooks

1986.CA.40123 187 CAL. APP. 3D 657; 232 CAL. RPTR. 65

    • $0.99
    • $0.99

Publisher Description

This appeal concerns applicability as a matter of law of the choice of law by parties to a contract. A California borrower sued its Colorado lender for treble the amount of interest paid on a promissory note, claiming the 44 percent rate was usurious. The note provided for application of Colorado law which permits an interest rate not to exceed 45 percent. The court sustained the lenders demurrer to the complaint for usury without leave to amend, holding as a matter of law the Colorado 44 percent rate selected by the parties did not constitute usury entitling the California borrower to sue for damages under California usury law. We shall conclude the applicability of Colorado law in the circumstances presented involves factual determinations, and reverse.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
1986
December 1
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
11
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SELLER
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
SIZE
58.7
KB
Marriage and Family Center v. Superior Court of San Diego County Marriage and Family Center v. Superior Court of San Diego County
1991
Irwin v. Pacific Southwest Airlines Irwin v. Pacific Southwest Airlines
1982
People v. Plies People v. Plies
1981
Holmes v. General Dynamics Corp. Holmes v. General Dynamics Corp.
1993
Mcgee v. Cessna Aircraft Co. Mcgee v. Cessna Aircraft Co.
1983
Branco V. Kearny Moto Park Branco V. Kearny Moto Park
1995