Comments on Daniel Houck’s Book (2020) "Aquinas, Original Sin And The Challenge Of Evolution‪"‬

Daniel W. Houck, at the John Leland Center for Theological Studies, attempts the refresh the theology of Thomas Aquinas, in regards to original sin. His book is published in 2020 by Cambridge University Press.
There is a drawback to Houck's effort. Unbeknownst to him, there are hypotheses on human evolution that the scientific community has not entertained. This is the nature of scientific inquiry. The paradigm concerning evolution, in general, remains unchallenged. The paradigm concerning human evolution is about to change.
To date, evolutionary scientists fail to address three questions. What is the ultimate human niche? Why are the past 8000 years so radically different than the preceding 1.8 million years? What is the nature of langue, the system of differences arbitrarily related to parole, in our current Lebenswelt?
Razie Mah proposes three hypotheses on the nature of human evolution.
The first proposal, elaborated in The Human Niche, states that hominins adapt to traidic relations. Our ultimate niche is not material.
The second proposal is that there is a twist in human evolution, starting 7820 years ago. An Archaeology of the Fall dramatizes. The First Singularity tells of a Fairy Tale Trace. Our current Lebenswelt is not the same as the Lebenswelt that we evolved in.
The third proposal considers the meaning, presence and message underlying a spoken word that is crucial to current civilizational discourse. How To Define the Word "Religion" marks the beginning of an inquiry into the nature of langue, in our current Lebenswelt.
The second hypothesis directly impacts Houck's recover of Aquinas.
Indeed, Aquinas treatment of original sin offers great insight into the nature of the first singularity.
The Tree of Life in the Garden of Eden is a metaphor for original justice.