Complete Auto Transit v. Brady
97 S. CT. 1076, 430 U.S. 274, 51 L. ED. 2D 326, 1977.SCT.41047
-
- $0.99
-
- $0.99
Publisher Description
Once again we are presented with "the perennial problem of the validity of a state tax for the privilege of carrying on, within a state, certain activities related to a corporations operation of an interstate business." Colonial Pipeline Co. v. Traigle, 421 U.S. 100, 101 (1975), quoting Memphis Gas Co. v. Stone, 335 U.S. 80, 85 (1948). The issue in this case is whether Mississippi runs afoul of the Commerce Clause, U.S. Const., Art. I, ? 8, cl. 3, when it applies the tax it imposes on "the privilege of... doing business" within the State to appellants activity in interstate commerce. The Supreme Court of Mississippi unanimously sustained the tax against
Rethinking the Role of the Dormant Commerce Clause in State Tax Jurisdiction.
2004
Capital One Bank (USA), N.A., F/K/a Capital One Bank, And Capital One, N.A., As Successor to Capital One F.S.B, Petitioners, V. Commissioner of Revenue of Massachusetts, Respondent. On Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
2009
Rethinking Tax Nexus and Apportionment: Voice, Exit, And the Dormant Commerce Clause.
2008