Complete Auto Transit v. Brady Complete Auto Transit v. Brady

Complete Auto Transit v. Brady

97 S. CT. 1076, 430 U.S. 274, 51 L. ED. 2D 326, 1977.SCT.41047

    • $0.99
    • $0.99

Publisher Description

Once again we are presented with "the perennial problem of the validity of a state tax for the privilege of carrying on, within a state, certain activities related to a corporations operation of an interstate business." Colonial Pipeline Co. v. Traigle, 421 U.S. 100, 101 (1975), quoting Memphis Gas Co. v. Stone, 335 U.S. 80, 85 (1948). The issue in this case is whether Mississippi runs afoul of the Commerce Clause, U.S. Const., Art. I, ? 8, cl. 3, when it applies the tax it imposes on "the privilege of... doing business" within the State to appellants activity in interstate commerce. The Supreme Court of Mississippi unanimously sustained the tax against

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
1977
March 7
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
21
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SELLER
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
SIZE
69.6
KB
Rethinking the Role of the Dormant Commerce Clause in State Tax Jurisdiction. Rethinking the Role of the Dormant Commerce Clause in State Tax Jurisdiction.
2004
Capital One Bank (USA), N.A., F/K/a Capital One Bank, And Capital One, N.A., As Successor to Capital One F.S.B, Petitioners, V. Commissioner of Revenue of Massachusetts, Respondent. On Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court Capital One Bank (USA), N.A., F/K/a Capital One Bank, And Capital One, N.A., As Successor to Capital One F.S.B, Petitioners, V. Commissioner of Revenue of Massachusetts, Respondent. On Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
2009
Rethinking Tax Nexus and Apportionment: Voice, Exit, And the Dormant Commerce Clause. Rethinking Tax Nexus and Apportionment: Voice, Exit, And the Dormant Commerce Clause.
2008
Roe Et Al. v. Wade Roe Et Al. v. Wade
1973
Plessy v. Ferguson. Plessy v. Ferguson.
1896
Miranda v. Arizona Miranda v. Arizona
1966
Burlington Northern And Santa Fe Railway Company V. White Burlington Northern And Santa Fe Railway Company V. White
2006
Terry v. Ohio Terry v. Ohio
1968
Mapp v. Ohio Mapp v. Ohio
1961