Condemnation Lands Situate and Being City Scranton v. Peter and Rebecca Kameroski Condemnation Lands Situate and Being City Scranton v. Peter and Rebecca Kameroski

Condemnation Lands Situate and Being City Scranton v. Peter and Rebecca Kameroski

1992.PA.44298 ; 616 A.2D 1102, 151 PA. COMMW. 345

Supreme Court of Tennessee
    • $0.99
    • $0.99

Publisher Description

The question before this Court is whether a redevelopment authority can condemn property in a blighted area which was not specifically listed as property to be condemned in a redevelopment plan, but which was connected to property properly listed to be condemned in the redevelopment plan.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
1992
October 28
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
6
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SELLER
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
SIZE
72.6
KB

More Books by Supreme Court of Tennessee

Commonwealth Pennsylvania v. Mumia Abu-Jamal Commonwealth Pennsylvania v. Mumia Abu-Jamal
Commonwealth Pennsylvania v. Mumia Abu-Jamal
1989
Kingsport Press v. Brenda Van Huss Et Al. Kingsport Press v. Brenda Van Huss Et Al.
Kingsport Press v. Brenda Van Huss Et Al.
1977
11/18/93 State Tennessee V. Oscar Franklin Smith 11/18/93 State Tennessee V. Oscar Franklin Smith
11/18/93 State Tennessee V. Oscar Franklin Smith
1993
Kenneth Mcdaniel v. Csx Transportation Kenneth Mcdaniel v. Csx Transportation
Kenneth Mcdaniel v. Csx Transportation
1997
Fanchetter Ennix and Russell Ennix V. Fanchetter Ennix and Russell Ennix V.
Fanchetter Ennix and Russell Ennix V.
1986
State Tennessee v. Stephen Drake and David State Tennessee v. Stephen Drake and David
State Tennessee v. Stephen Drake and David
1985