David Graf v. Clark B. Frame David Graf v. Clark B. Frame

David Graf v. Clark B. Frame

1986.WV.184, 352 S.E.2D 31, 177 W.VA. 282

    • $0.99
    • $0.99

Publisher Description

1. "A writ of mandamus will not issue unless three elements coexist--(1) a clear [legal] right in the petitioner to the relief sought; (2) a [clear] legal duty on the part of respondent to do the thing which the petitioner seeks to compel; and (3) the absence of another adequate remedy. Syl. pt. 2, State ex rel. Kucera v. City of Wheeling, 153 W.Va. 538, 170 S.E.2d 367 (1969)." Syl., Oakley v. Gainer, 175 W.Va. 115, 331 S.E.2d 846 (1985).

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
1986
March 12
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
27
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SELLER
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
SIZE
69.9
KB

More Books by United States Court Of Appeals For The Sixth Circuit

Journeymen Pipe Fitters Local 392 V. National Labor Relations Board Journeymen Pipe Fitters Local 392 V. National Labor Relations Board
1983
Eyerman V. Mary Kay Cosmetics Inc. Eyerman V. Mary Kay Cosmetics Inc.
1992
Vestal v. Hoffa Vestal v. Hoffa
1971
Amway Distributors Benefits Association V. Northfield Insurance Co. Amway Distributors Benefits Association V. Northfield Insurance Co.
2003
Elder-Beerman Stores Corp. V. Federated Department Stores Inc. Elder-Beerman Stores Corp. V. Federated Department Stores Inc.
1972
Black Law Enforcement Officers Association V. City Of Akron Black Law Enforcement Officers Association V. City Of Akron
1987