Doe v. City of Murrieta Doe v. City of Murrieta

Doe v. City of Murrieta

102 Cal.App.4th 899, 126 Cal.Rptr.2d 213, 2002.CA.0009184, 2 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 10, 234

    • $0.99
    • $0.99

Publisher Description

Plaintiffs contend the trial court erred in ruling as to the second, third, and fourth causes of action that defendants were
not vicariously liable for Officer Derick Boyd's sexual misconduct. Plaintiffs further argue the trial court erred in granting
summary judgment as to the first and fifth causes of action since triable issues existed as to whether defendants negligently
hired, trained, and supervised Boyd, and as to whether defendants breached the Boy Scouts of America (BSA) charter agreement
by failing to follow BSA rules and regulations.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
2002
October 8
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
32
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SELLER
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
SIZE
70.9
KB

More Books by California Court of Appeals

Planned Parenthood Golden Gate v. Superior Court of San Mateo County Planned Parenthood Golden Gate v. Superior Court of San Mateo County
2000
Frase v. Gourley Frase v. Gourley
2000
Department Of Children And Family Services Department Of Children And Family Services
2002
Napa Citizens for Honest Government v. Napa County Board of Supervisors Napa Citizens for Honest Government v. Napa County Board of Supervisors
2001
Sully-Miller Contracting Company v. Gledson/Cashman Construction Sully-Miller Contracting Company v. Gledson/Cashman Construction
2002
Paterno V. State Paterno V. State
1999