Dusky v. United States Dusky v. United States

Dusky v. United States

80 S. Ct. 788, 362 U.S. 402, 4 L. Ed. 2d 824, SCT.40601(1960)

    • $0.99
    • $0.99

Publisher Description

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. Upon consideration of the entire record we agree with the Solicitor General that ""the record in this case does not sufficiently support the findings of competency to stand trial,"" for to support those findings under 18 U. S. C. § 4244 the district judge ""would need more information than this record presents."" We also agree with the suggestion of the Solicitor General that it is not enough for the district judge to find that ""the defendant [is] oriented to time and place and [has] some recollection of events,"" but that the ""test must be whether he has sufficient present ability to consult with his lawyer with a reasonable degree of rational understanding -- and whether he has a rational as well as factual understanding of the proceedings against him.""

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
1960
April 18
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
1
Page
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SELLER
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
SIZE
54.2
KB
Roe Et Al. v. Wade Roe Et Al. v. Wade
1973
Plessy v. Ferguson. Plessy v. Ferguson.
1896
Miranda v. Arizona Miranda v. Arizona
1966
Loving Et Ux. v. Virginia Loving Et Ux. v. Virginia
1967
Pollock v. Farmers Loan and Trust Company. Pollock v. Farmers Loan and Trust Company.
1895
Mapp v. Ohio Mapp v. Ohio
1961