Eck v. Helene Curtis Industries Inc. Eck v. Helene Curtis Industries Inc.

Eck v. Helene Curtis Industries Inc.

453 P.2D 366, 9 ARIZ. APP. 426, 1969.AZ.40401

    • $0.99
    • $0.99

Publisher Description

On 1 April 1968, Mrs. Eck went to the Hollywood Beauty Shop which was owned by Mrs. Smagacz for the purpose of obtaining "an end permanent". She told the beauty operator, Mrs. Ames, that she "wanted a Helene Curtis Creme Cold Wave" which was "on special". Mrs. Eck testified that while she was taking the permanent she complained, about four different times, that it was burning her head and hurting. Mrs. Ames alleged reply to the complaints was that it probably was rolled too tight. On at least one occasion Mrs. Ames either moved a curl or loosened one.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
1969
April 9
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
5
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SELLER
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
SIZE
57.4
KB
Timmerman v. U.S. Bank Timmerman v. U.S. Bank
2007
Morley v. Central Intelligence Agency Morley v. Central Intelligence Agency
2007
Trudeau v. Federal Trade Commission Trudeau v. Federal Trade Commission
2006
Southwest Auto Painting And Body Repair Inc. V. Binsfeld Southwest Auto Painting And Body Repair Inc. V. Binsfeld
1995
M & M Auto Storage Pool Inc. V. Chemical Waste Management Inc. M & M Auto Storage Pool Inc. V. Chemical Waste Management Inc.
1990
Bell V. State Bell V. State
1984