Edward L. Mitchell v. State

[In our original opinion we said: "Appellant puts much emphasis upon the fact that the instrument was dated March 8, 1955 whereas
the indictment alleges it was passed on or about June 14, 1956." On rehearing he asserts that on June 14, 1956, this contract
would not enable its holder, had it been true, to have maintained a civil suit thereon without alleging additional facts because
by its terms it was to have been performed and all obligations thereunder ceased long prior to June 14, 1956.