Ernest D. Hargis v. United Farm Bureau Ernest D. Hargis v. United Farm Bureau

Ernest D. Hargis v. United Farm Bureau

1979.IN.30231 388 N.E.2D 1175; 180 IND. APP. 432

    • $0.99
    • $0.99

Publisher Description

The instant appeal presents a situation in which the driver of an automobile, defendant-appellant Gary L. Stauffer, contends there was insufficient evidence of "wanton or wilful misconduct" under Indianas guest statute, IND. CODE 9-3-3-1, supporting a jury verdict in favor of his passenger, plaintiff-appellee Daniel L. Lothamer, in the amount of $59,000 for injuries which Lothamer sustained in a one-car collision which occurred in Fort Wayne, Indiana. In addition, numerous other issues are presented for our review, among them that the damages awarded were excessive, certain evidence was improperly admitted, instructions improperly given and refused, and the jurys verdict was invalid due to alleged juror coercion and statements purportedly made to jurors by the bailiff. We affirm.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
1979
April 30
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
9
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SELLER
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
SIZE
61.7
KB
Charles Capps v. Richard M. Klebs Charles Capps v. Richard M. Klebs
1978
Ralph Raymond Storm And Ralph Thomas Storm Ralph Raymond Storm And Ralph Thomas Storm
1973
Ismat Bano Siddiqi v. Review Board Indiana Ismat Bano Siddiqi v. Review Board Indiana
1979
Germaine E. Tomlinson v. Harold Tomlinson Germaine E. Tomlinson v. Harold Tomlinson
1976
Farm Bureau Insurance Company v. Randall Farm Bureau Insurance Company v. Randall
1971
Bole v. Civil City Ligonier Bole v. Civil City Ligonier
1959