False Confession Vs. Investigative Logic (Report)
The Forensic Examiner 2012, Spring, 21, 1
-
- $5.99
-
- $5.99
Publisher Description
ABSTRACT A confession is one of the most powerful types of evidence presented against a person charged with a crime, since few people believe an innocent person would confess to a crime, yet it happens with surprising frequency. The case presented in this article begins with a man calling the police to say he killed his wife. Police investigated under the theory that it was a domestic violence homicide. The analysis of the crime scene evidence, the overlooked evidence, and the use of investigative logic challenges the premise of the law enforcement process.
More Books Like This
More Books by The Forensic Examiner
Do You Speak Body Language? Mastering the Art of Nonverbal Communication Key in Interrogations (Case Study)
2008
Murder--One Jurisdiction at a Time: The Case of Robert Ben Rhoades (Case Study)
2007
Behavioral Profiling & Risk Assessment Using Written Communication (Report)
2008
Interpreting Nonverbal Communication for Use in Detecting Deception (Ce ARTICLE: 2 CE CREDITS)
2010
Kent Kiehl: Peering Inside the Psychopath's Mind (Profile)
2011
Observe Carefully, Deduce Shrewdly: Dr. Joseph Bell (Case Study) (Biography) (Essay)
2009