Fenn V. Sherriff Fenn V. Sherriff

Fenn V. Sherriff

    • $0.99
    • $0.99

Publisher Description

Pursuant to Family Code section 3102, *fn1 plaintiffs H. Sterling Fenn and Jan Fenn (grandparents) petitioned for a court order allowing them visitation with their grandchildren, Andrew and Benjamin, following the death of their daughter, Kathryn Sherriff. (All further section references are to the Family Code unless otherwise noted.) The children's father, defendant Robert Sherriff (father), opposed the petition and moved for summary judgment on the ground he and his new wife, who had adopted the children, both objected to court-ordered visitation. Among other things, father argued section 3102 "is unconstitutional as applied if it is construed to provide grandparent visitation over the objection of both parents." The trial court granted summary judgment on the ground grandparents had failed to allege father was an unfit parent and, in any event, had failed to raise a triable issue of fact as to father's fitness as a parent.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
2003
June 25
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
44
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SELLER
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
SIZE
75.2
KB

More Books by California Court of Appeals

Planned Parenthood Golden Gate v. Superior Court of San Mateo County Planned Parenthood Golden Gate v. Superior Court of San Mateo County
2000
Frase v. Gourley Frase v. Gourley
2000
Department Of Children And Family Services Department Of Children And Family Services
2002
Napa Citizens for Honest Government v. Napa County Board of Supervisors Napa Citizens for Honest Government v. Napa County Board of Supervisors
2001
Sully-Miller Contracting Company v. Gledson/Cashman Construction Sully-Miller Contracting Company v. Gledson/Cashman Construction
2002
Paterno V. State Paterno V. State
1999