Foster V. Xerox Corp. Foster V. Xerox Corp.

Foster V. Xerox Corp‪.‬

    • $0.99
    • $0.99

Publisher Description

An employee who suffers an injury in the course of his employment may recover damages in an action at law only if he comes within certain exceptions to the workers' compensation law. (Lab. Code, §§ 3600, 3602.)*fn1 One of these exceptions is embodied in subdivision (b)(2) of section 3602 (hereinafter subdivision (b)(2)). It provides that an action at law may be brought "Where the employee's injury is aggravated by the employer's fraudulent concealment of the existence of the injury and its connection with the employment, in which case the employer's liability shall be limited to those damages proximately caused by the aggravation."*fn2 The primary   issue here is whether the "fraudulent concealment" referred to in this provision requires affirmative misrepresentations by the employer regarding the existence of the injury and its connection with the employment, or whether

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
1985
November 4
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
11
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SELLER
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
SIZE
59.2
KB
Hasson V. Ford Motor Co. Hasson V. Ford Motor Co.
1977
Lugosi V. Universal Pictures Lugosi V. Universal Pictures
1979
Wells Fargo Bank V. Superior Court Wells Fargo Bank V. Superior Court
1991
Kruger V. Wells Fargo Bank Kruger V. Wells Fargo Bank
1974
Nestle V. City Of Santa Monica Nestle V. City Of Santa Monica
1972
Burtis V. Universal Pictures Co. Burtis V. Universal Pictures Co.
1953