God's Battalions God's Battalions

God's Battalions

The Case for the Crusades

    • 4.0 • 3 Ratings
    • $23.99

Publisher Description

The author of The Rise of Christianity reviews the history of the seven major crusades from 1095-1291 in this work of religious revisionist history.

Distinguished and award-winning scholar Rodney Stark takes on the current vogue in liberal thinking to argue that, in fact, the Crusades were not unprovoked. They were not the first round of European colonialism. They were not conducted for land, loot, or converts. The Crusaders were not barbarians who victimized the cultivated Muslims. They sincerely believed that they served in God's Battalions.

In the wake of many recent books justifying Muslim holy wars by criticizing the historic use of violence by Christians, Stark presents the other side of the story. Drawing upon a wide variety of sources, Stark argues the facts and figures about why and how Christianity attempted to secure the Holy Lands and protect the safety of Christian pilgrims.

"Rewards a careful reading, and not only because the story itself is so gripping, with tales of courage and desperation, outsized characters, and fate of cultures hanging in the balance. . . . Masterful . . . sets the record straight." —National Catholic Register

"Christian readers should welcome Stark's affirmation of the best in scholarship, both old and new, and his willingness to argue a controversial position." —Christian Scholar's Review

"There is much to be learned here. Filled with fascinating historical glimpses of monks and Templars, priests and pilgrims, kings and contemplatives, Stark pulls it all together and challenges us to reconsider our view of the Crusades." —Publishers Weekly

GENRE
History
RELEASED
2009
September 16
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
292
Pages
PUBLISHER
HarperOne
SELLER
OpenRoad Integrated Media, LLC
SIZE
2.2
MB

Customer Reviews

baconandtoast ,

Not very great

It’s gives decent context on why the Christian states went on the 1st crusade. Unfortunately it is of course very biased to the crusaders throughout the whole book. Portraying them as always being right and never doing any wrong. All of the wrongdoings of the crusaders are pushed to a different group or the poor that followed the crusaders. Historical accuracy should be the most important thing when writing about an historical event. All I want is the truth when it comes to history, not biased views to whatever side the writer supports.

The Victory of Reason The Victory of Reason
2005
The Rise of Christianity The Rise of Christianity
2020
Bearing False Witness Bearing False Witness
2016
The Triumph of Christianity The Triumph of Christianity
2011
Cities of God Cities of God
2009
Reformation Myths Reformation Myths
2017