Gusher of Lies
The Dangerous Delusions of ""Energy Independence""
-
- $12.99
-
- $12.99
Publisher Description
Everybody is talking about "energy independence." But is it really achievable -- or even desirable? In this controversial, meticulously researched book, Robert Bryce exposes the false promises and political posturing behind the rhetoric. Gusher of Lies explains why the idea of energy independence appeals to voters while also showing that renewable sources like wind and solar cannot meet America's growing energy demand. Along the way, Bryce exposes the ethanol scam as one of the longest-running robberies ever perpetrated on American taxpayers. In a new foreword to this edition, he shows how energy independence rhetoric was used during the 2008 election, even as the heavily subsidized ethanol business fueled a growing global food crisis.
PUBLISHERS WEEKLY
In this often caustic and thought-provoking book, Bryce (Pipe Dreams, Cronies), a self-described "charter member of the Disgusted Party ...a raging moderate who leans toward the libertarian," attempts to debunk the pervasive call for U.S. energy independence, arguing that despite continuous rhetoric from all sides to the contrary, energy independence is neither "doable nor desirable." The book gives a short history of oil, delineating the gradual shift of power from Texas to OPEC to foreign markets and the escalating U.S. militarization of the Persian Gulf to try to maintain energy security. Bryce contends that "energy demand will almost surely continue rising" and the proposed alternatives-biofuels, wind and solar energy-are chimeras, preventing Americans from confronting the reality that we "will be relying on fossil fuels for years to come." The book argues that, rather than try to militarily control oil-rich nations to secure our energy needs, the US should accept that energy trading is global and pursue diplomatic routes to assure open, healthy and efficient markets. Despite the wisdom and lucidity of his analysis, Bryce's arguments are undermined by his curmudgeonly attacks on environmental activists on the left and right, and his stance as apparently one of the last remaining global warming skeptics somewhat cripples his credibility.
