Halberstadt v. Harris Tr. & Sav. Bank Halberstadt v. Harris Tr. & Sav. Bank

Halberstadt v. Harris Tr. & Sav. Bank

302 N.E.2d 64, 55 Ill.2d 121, IL.0001134(1973)

    • $0.99
    • $0.99

Publisher Description

Plaintiff, Violet Halberstadt, as the widow of Gerald Halberstadt, filed a second amended complaint in the circuit court of Cook County charging defendants Harris Trust & Savings Bank (building owner), N.W. Harris Corporation (building manager), and Robert Van Nest (management employee) with violations of the Structural Work Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1965, ch. 48, par. 60 et seq.) which she alleged proximately caused her husband's death when he fell from a commercial office building while washing windows on July 22, 1965. The circuit court granted defendants' motion to dismiss the complaint, ruling that deceased's occupation was not within those afforded protection by this statute. The appellate court reversed and remanded, holding that the complaint was properly filed and that deceased was within the occupational category protected by the statute. (Halberstadt v. Harris Trust & Savings Bank (1972), 7 Ill. App.3d 991.) We granted leave to appeal. Defendants argue that the second amended complaint (filed April 30, 1971) superseded prior pleadings and, invoking the Structural Work Act in this complaint almost six years after deceased's accident, is for that reason barred by limitations. The facts relevant to this contention are as follows. On July 18, 1966, a two-count complaint was filed against Harris Trust & Savings Bank by Violet Halberstadt in her capacity individually, as administrator of the deceased's estate, and as the mother and next friend of their six minor children. The first count charged defendant with violations of the Structural Work Act in that it failed to provide deceased with a safe scaffold during his work, thereby necessitating deceased's use of flanged hooks affixed to the building as his sole means of support. These hooks were alleged to have been corroded and paint encrusted. The second count, as now characterized by defendants, charged a violation of the Injuries Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1965, ch. 70, par. 1 et seq.) and sought damages for loss of means of support.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
1973
September 25
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
8
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SELLER
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
SIZE
68.6
KB

More Books by Supreme Court of Illinois

People v. Gacy People v. Gacy
1984
Ill. Gamefowl Breeders Ass'n v. Block Ill. Gamefowl Breeders Ass'n v. Block
1979
The People v. Hampton The People v. Hampton
1969
People Ex Rel. Myers v. Briggs People Ex Rel. Myers v. Briggs
1970
The People v. Dewey The People v. Dewey
1969
Peo. Ex Rel. Kucharski v. Adams Peo. Ex Rel. Kucharski v. Adams
1971