Hall V. Shipley Hall V. Shipley
    • $0.99

Publisher Description

In this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, Jon Shipley, Jack Mansfield, Don Boles and Phillip Nall, police officers for the City of Oak Ridge, Tennessee, appeal the district court's denial of their motion for summary judgment on grounds of qualified immunity. Officers Nall, Boles and Mansfield also appeal the district court's denial of their motion for summary judgment on grounds that service of process on them was insufficient and outside the one-year statute of limitations. The officers bring this interlocutory appeal as of right. 28 U.S.C. § 1291. For the following reasons, we affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
1991
May 8
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
18
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SELLER
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
SIZE
57.5
KB

More Books by United States Court Of Appeals For The Sixth Circuit

Journeymen Pipe Fitters Local 392 V. National Labor Relations Board Journeymen Pipe Fitters Local 392 V. National Labor Relations Board
1983
Eyerman V. Mary Kay Cosmetics Inc. Eyerman V. Mary Kay Cosmetics Inc.
1992
Vestal v. Hoffa Vestal v. Hoffa
1971
Amway Distributors Benefits Association V. Northfield Insurance Co. Amway Distributors Benefits Association V. Northfield Insurance Co.
2003
Elder-Beerman Stores Corp. V. Federated Department Stores Inc. Elder-Beerman Stores Corp. V. Federated Department Stores Inc.
1972
Black Law Enforcement Officers Association V. City Of Akron Black Law Enforcement Officers Association V. City Of Akron
1987