Hank Albers v. Nodak Racing Club Hank Albers v. Nodak Racing Club

Hank Albers v. Nodak Racing Club

1977.ND.72 , 256 N.W.2D 355

    • $0.99
    • $0.99

Publisher Description

An amended complaint by Albers, plaintiff-appellee, was served upon NoDak Racing Club, defendant-appellant, demanding an equitable share of the revenues derived from car races of the sprint car division. NoDak timely answered the complaint and demanded a trial by jury. Shortly thereafter Albers filed a note of issue dated 17 September 1976 stating, among other things, that a jury trial had been demanded. Interrogatories dated 20 September 1976 by Hank Albers were served upon NoDak. The deposition of Hank Albers was taken on 10 November 1976. NoDak, by written motion dated 22 December 1976 moved to dismiss the action and complaint for failure to state grounds upon which relief may be granted under Rule 12(b)(5), North Dakota Rules of Civil Procedure, or for a more definite statement pursuant to Rule 12(e), NDRCivP. The notice of motion to dismiss stated that it would be based upon the notice, the pleadings, records and file herein and other oral or documentary evidence. Hank Albers responded to the motion to dismiss in writing, dated 27 December 1976, and by motion dated 27 December 1976 moved for summary judgment. He also filed a brief dated 27 December 1976 entitled "Brief in Response to Motion to Dismiss and in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment." On 28 October 1976 NoDak answered Albers interrogatories and on the same day served them upon Albers. The motion for summary judgment came on for hearing 28 December 1976, and on 5 January 1977 the court issued its findings of fact, Conclusions of law and order for summary judgment. The summary judgment pursuant to such order was issued on 5 January 1977, from which NoDak appealed.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
1977
July 27
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
11
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SELLER
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
SIZE
62.1
KB

More Books by Supreme Court of North Dakota

Denis Dean Mertz v. Melody Ann Mertz Denis Dean Mertz v. Melody Ann Mertz
1989
Bismarck Baptist Church And Church Mutual Bismarck Baptist Church And Church Mutual
1972
Hunt Oil Company And Williams Oil Company Hunt Oil Company And Williams Oil Company
1979
State North Dakota v. Calvin Newnam State North Dakota v. Calvin Newnam
1987
Mary Charlotte Kottsick and Virgil Mary Charlotte Kottsick and Virgil
1976
Baldwin Piano Company v. L.E. Wylie Baldwin Piano Company v. L.E. Wylie
1933