Harris v. Allen

Per Curiam: Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint and his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988) petition and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinions and find no reversible error or abuse of discretion. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Harris v. Allen, No. CA-94-649-3 (E.D. Va. Dec. 5, 1994; Dec. 19, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.