Harris v. Amgen Harris v. Amgen

Harris v. Amgen

573 F.3D 728, 47 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS CAS. 1332, 09 CAL. DAILY OP. SERV. 8873, 2009.C09.0003188

    • $0.99
    • $0.99

Publisher Description

Steve Harris and Dennis F. Ramos (collectively, "Plaintiffs") sued Amgen, Inc. ("Amgen") and several Amgen directors and officers, alleging that the defendants breached their fiduciary duties under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act ("ERISA") in their operation of two ERISA retirement plans. The district court dismissed Harriss claims on the ground that he lacked standing as an ERISA plan "participant" because he had withdrawn all of his assets from his plan. It also dismissed Ramoss claims, reasoning that although Ramos had standing, he did not allege any claims against defendants who were fiduciaries under the plan. The district court then denied Plaintiffs leave to amend their complaint.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
2009
July 14
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
17
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SELLER
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
SIZE
63.8
KB

More Books by Supreme Court of Alabama

State Alabama and George C. Wallace As State Alabama and George C. Wallace As
1975
John Lewis Mcphearson v. State Alabama John Lewis Mcphearson v. State Alabama
1960
George C. Wallace v. Board Education George C. Wallace v. Board Education
1967
Peggy Ostell Goldin v. State Alabama Peggy Ostell Goldin v. State Alabama
1961
Johnny Daniel Beecher v. State Alabama Johnny Daniel Beecher v. State Alabama
1966
Educators Investment Corporation Alabama Educators Investment Corporation Alabama
1980