Hewlett-Packard v. Mustek Systems Hewlett-Packard v. Mustek Systems

Hewlett-Packard v. Mustek Systems

340 F.3d 1314, 2003.CFC.0000179 , S.P.Q.2d 1825(67 U)

    • $0.99
    • $0.99

Publisher Description

Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge DYK. Dissenting opinion filed by Chief Judge MAYER. Mustek Systems, Inc. and Mustek, Inc. (collectively ""Mustek"" or ""appellants"") appeal the judgment of literal infringement of claims 1, 4, and 7-9 of United States Patent No. 5,336,878 (""the `878 patent""). Hewlett-Packard Co. v. Mustek Sys., Inc., No. 99-CV-0351, slip op. at 13-18 (S.D. Cal. Apr. 26, 2002) (""Order Re: Post-Trial Motions""). Hewlett-Packard Co. (""Hewlett"" or ""appellee"") cross-appeals the judgment of invalidity under 35 U.S.C. § 102 of claim 1 and under 35 U.S.C. § 103 of claims 1-8 of United States Patent No. 4,837,635 (""the `635 patent""). Id. at 5-10. On the main appeal, we vacate the judgment of infringement of the asserted claims of the `878 patent. On the cross appeal, we affirm the judgment of invalidity of the asserted claims of the `635 patent.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
2003
August 7
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
26
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SELLER
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
SIZE
73.1
KB
Semiconductor Energy Laboratory Co. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Semiconductor Energy Laboratory Co. v. Samsung Electronics Co.
2000
Northern Telecom Ltd. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Northern Telecom Ltd. v. Samsung Electronics Co.
2000
Reiffin v. Microsoft Corp. Reiffin v. Microsoft Corp.
2000
Bose Corporation V. Qsc Audio Products Bose Corporation V. Qsc Audio Products
2002
Karlin Technology v. Surgical Dynamics Inc. Karlin Technology v. Surgical Dynamics Inc.
1999
Dow Chemical Co. V. Sumitomo Chemical Company Dow Chemical Co. V. Sumitomo Chemical Company
2001