Illingworth V. Bushong Illingworth V. Bushong

Illingworth V. Bushong

    • $0.99
    • $0.99

Publisher Description

The narrow issue is whether the trial court erred in deciding that a forfeiture clause in an earnest money agreement was not a valid liquidated damages provision. We hold that there was no error in that respect. The broader question addressed in this opinion is how the validity of such clauses is to be tested.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
1984
September 5
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
31
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SELLER
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
SIZE
66.8
KB

More Books by Supreme Court of Oregon

Stelljes v. State Board of Parole Stelljes v. State Board of Parole
1989
Oregon v. Thoma Oregon v. Thoma
1992
Suess Builders Co. v. City of Beaverton Suess Builders Co. v. City of Beaverton
1982
In Re Complaint As To Conduct of James L. Hiller In Re Complaint As To Conduct of James L. Hiller
1985
Brooks Resources Corp. v. Department of Revenue Brooks Resources Corp. v. Department of Revenue
1979
Jorritsma v. Farmers Feed & Supply Co. Jorritsma v. Farmers Feed & Supply Co.
1975